Part 2: Who Said What, How Decisions Were Made, and What It Means Locally - 01/17/2025

Irene Harris, as chair, guided the meeting with a steady focus on accessibility as a shared responsibility. She emphasized that accessibility must be considered every time the County spends money or changes services, not treated as an afterthought. Her leadership reinforced the committee’s advocacy role and the importance of lived experience.

Catalina Blumenberg, municipal clerk, played a central role in explaining procedures, legal frameworks, and next steps. She clearly outlined how committee recommendations move to Council and confirmed that staff will bring forward reports on the accessibility lens and EDI training, which directly affects how County departments operate.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap.

Jeff Beattie provided some of the most impactful input of the meeting. He shared detailed personal experiences as a Deaf individual navigating healthcare services, highlighting serious communication and privacy barriers. His recommendations focused on video interpreting, visual signage, and inclusive consultation, which directly affect Deaf and hard of hearing residents across the County. Jeff also authored the proposed accessibility lens definition, pushing for lived experience to be embedded in decision-making. The committee supported his approach and voted to move it forward for further development.

Jane Lesslie strongly advocated for engaging with Quinte Health and the hospital redevelopment team as early as possible. She emphasized that accessibility mistakes are costly and difficult to fix after construction, and that poor design can impact safety, dignity, and health outcomes. Her motion to invite hospital representatives to present their plans was approved.

Stuart Houlihan supported both the hospital outreach and the accessibility lens, sharing that physical accessibility issues also remain widespread. His comments reinforced that barriers are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern affecting wheelchair users and others with mobility challenges.

Martha Hayter added legal context, noting that even new public buildings often fail accessibility standards when lived experience is not included early. She supported proactive engagement to prevent repeating past mistakes.

Caroline Reese, Artemis Saunders, Sarah Moffat, and Gage Rickman played key roles in shaping National Accessibility Week planning. They highlighted the importance of youth engagement, social media reach, public education, and visible community events. Their involvement ensures that accessibility awareness reaches small businesses, young people, and the general public, not just government spaces.

The committee approved multiple motions during the meeting, including endorsing the annual report, forming a National Accessibility Week organizing group, sending a letter to the province, inviting hospital representatives, requesting an accessibility lens report, and endorsing planning file comments.

For local residents, these decisions mean earlier involvement in major projects, stronger advocacy for accessible services, better public awareness, and a clear push to make accessibility part of everyday decision-making across Prince Edward County.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 5:21:22. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.