Part 2: Committee Pushes for Practical Accessibility Improvements Across the County – 07/18/2024

The meeting focused heavily on turning accessibility planning into practical action, particularly around local businesses, public infrastructure, parks, beaches, and long-term community inclusion.

Throughout the discussion, committee members repeatedly emphasized that accessibility cannot remain a secondary consideration added late in projects. Instead, they argued it must become part of everyday planning, budgeting, and decision-making across the County.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap.

Irene Harris Pushes Accessibility Higher on Council’s Agenda

Committee Chair Irene Harris repeatedly emphasized that the Accessibility Advisory Committee must actively advise Council and continue pushing accessibility issues forward, especially with the approaching January 1 provincial accessibility deadline.

She stressed that accessibility cannot simply wait until budgets or conditions become ideal and argued that the committee has a responsibility to keep accessibility visible during municipal planning discussions.

Her comments reflected concern that accessibility work can easily lose momentum when financial pressures or competing infrastructure priorities emerge.

For residents living with disabilities, seniors, caregivers, and visitors, Harris’s leadership signaled ongoing pressure for accessibility to remain a meaningful County priority rather than a symbolic commitment.

Business Survey Highlights Gaps in Accessibility Awareness

One of the meeting’s largest discussions centered on the tourism and hospitality accessibility survey presented by Eleanor Cook.

Cook explained that many local businesses want to improve accessibility but often lack clear information, practical guidance, or financial resources to make changes confidently.

The survey showed that some business owners remain unfamiliar with accessibility requirements under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), while others focus mainly on visible physical barriers without recognizing communication, sensory, or customer-service accessibility concerns.

Committee members discussed how businesses repeatedly requested simple resources such as checklists, online guides, funding information, and practical examples tailored to smaller operations and older buildings.

Caroline Rees Broadens the Accessibility Conversation

Committee member Caroline Rees helped broaden the conversation by pointing out that formal AODA compliance requirements only apply to businesses above a certain employee threshold, but that accessibility should still be viewed as a broader community standard and best practice for everyone.

She emphasized repeatedly that accessibility is not limited to ramps, accessible washrooms, or parking spaces. Instead, Rees encouraged businesses and the County to think more broadly about communication barriers, sensory experiences, customer service interactions, website accessibility, and social inclusion.

For the community, her comments reinforced that true accessibility involves how people experience spaces, services, and interactions overall, not just physical entry into buildings.

County Buildings and Infrastructure Planning

Discussion then shifted toward County-owned buildings and future infrastructure upgrades.

Lisa Sverson explained that accessibility improvements are being incorporated into long-term building planning but acknowledged that many facilities require major structural repairs or lifecycle upgrades before accessibility retrofits can be completed effectively. She clarified that accessibility will be integrated into future projects rather than treated as an afterthought added late in the process.

Sverson also noted that decisions depend heavily on building condition, long-term ownership plans, and available funding.

For residents using town halls, community centres, recreation facilities, and municipal buildings, this means accessibility improvements are expected to happen gradually through larger building renewal projects rather than through isolated standalone upgrades.

Kate MacNaughton Pushes for Earlier Accessibility Involvement

Councillor Kate MacNaughton repeatedly pressed staff for greater clarity around timelines, project prioritization, and how early the Accessibility Advisory Committee will be involved in future design decisions.

She emphasized that accessibility concerns should be addressed at the beginning of planning processes rather than later when options become limited or expensive.

MacNaughton’s role throughout the discussion was particularly important because she acts as a bridge between committee recommendations and formal Council decision-making.

Accessible Parks and Playgrounds Receive Positive Feedback

One of the meeting’s most positive updates involved recent improvements at Jack Taylor Park, Consacon Park, and Macaulay Village Park.

Lisa Sverson confirmed that all three parks now exceed minimum accessibility standards and include more accessible play equipment and inclusive features than required under provincial guidelines. Committee members highlighted the importance of accessible play spaces for children and families, especially in areas where recreational opportunities have historically been limited.

Sarah Moffitt shared positive feedback received from the community, particularly regarding improvements at Macaulay Village Park. For families with children living with disabilities, the upgraded parks represent visible progress toward more inclusive recreation opportunities within Prince Edward County.

Youth Accessibility Concerns Raised

Committee member Artemis repeatedly brought attention to youth accessibility and the lack of inclusive spaces designed for older children and teenagers.

The discussion emphasized that accessibility planning often focuses heavily on younger children while overlooking the social and recreational needs of teens, particularly teens living with disabilities.

Artemis raised concerns about safety, gathering spaces, social isolation, and long-term recreation planning. For local youth and families, the discussion highlighted growing awareness that accessibility also includes creating welcoming community spaces where teenagers and young adults can safely socialize and participate.

Accessible Parking and Beach Access Become Major Priority

One of the most important discussions involved accessible parking and access at parks and beaches throughout the County. The committee reviewed previous accessibility audits identifying numerous gaps where residents with mobility challenges still struggle to reach beaches, waterfronts, or outdoor recreation spaces.

Irene Harris strongly supported a motion requesting that Council direct staff to return with a clear implementation plan for accessible parking and park access improvements based on existing audit findings.

Councillor Kate MacNaughton supported the overall goal but encouraged flexibility around potential funding sources so progress would not become stalled waiting for one specific grant or budget stream. The final motion reflected that compromise by requesting a practical implementation plan rather than tying recommendations to a single funding mechanism.

Committee Advances Multiple Accessibility Initiatives

The committee unanimously voted to receive major presentations and reports, support accessibility-related grant applications, streamline the Access the County task team, and appoint Artemis to the Transit Strategy Task Team.

Members also unanimously supported recommending that Council direct staff to develop a concrete plan for accessible parking and access improvements at parks and beaches. These votes demonstrated unusually strong alignment across the committee regarding the importance of turning accessibility discussions into measurable action.

Overall Takeaway From the Meeting

Overall, the meeting reflected a committee increasingly focused on practical implementation rather than broad accessibility statements alone.

Discussions involving business accessibility, parks, youth inclusion, municipal infrastructure, and accessible outdoor spaces all pointed toward a broader understanding of accessibility as something woven into everyday community life.

For Prince Edward County residents, the meeting signaled continued movement toward more inclusive planning, stronger public accountability, and a growing expectation that accessibility considerations must become part of how the County designs spaces, delivers services, and plans for the future.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 2:26:00. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.