Part 1: PEC Affordable Housing Board Tackles Financial Questions, New Working Groups and Nile Street Progress — 09/14/2026
Prince Edward County’s Affordable Housing Corporation Board met on September 14, 2026, with finances, board organization and progress at the Nile Street property taking up much of the open meeting. Councillor Phil St-Jean, Picton Ward, chaired the meeting and confirmed that the board had quorum. There were no presentations, deputations or public comments, allowing members to move directly into the corporation’s ongoing work.
Before that work began, the board also heard an announcement about the September 19 Grand Parade fundraiser for Friends of Pinecrest. The event was described as a two- and five-kilometre walk supporting affordable housing in Bloomfield.
View the entire PEC Council meeting, or continue to speaker comments and councillor votes>
Financial Statements Bring Questions to the Table
The 2025 draft audited financial statements led to a lengthy discussion, partly because the auditor was not present to answer members’ questions. Several members wanted more information about approximately $687,437 shown as due to the County, including exactly what expenses were included and how repayment would eventually be handled. Questions were also raised about a $36,000 loan and how the corporation’s tangible capital assets were being reported.
Staff clarified that no interest had been applied to loans on either property and that the $36,000 represented an unspent amount. Members also discussed the reported value of capital assets and how expenses associated with the Nile Street and Disraeli projects were being recorded. The board agreed that many of these questions would be better answered directly by the auditor, and members were encouraged to submit their questions in advance so detailed responses could be prepared for a future meeting.
The discussion also exposed concerns about how financial information moves between the Affordable Housing Corporation and the County. One member said obtaining detailed cost information for the Disraeli project had taken considerable time and had affected work related to Build Canada Homes. Staff acknowledged challenges created partly by the corporation and municipality using different accounting software and agreed to bring the concerns back to the County’s treasurer.
Action Tracker Gets a Closer Look
The board next reviewed its September action tracker, which had been updated to reflect strategic priorities and ongoing work. Members questioned whether the document should distinguish formal motions requiring action from broader plans that could continue over a longer period.
There was also discussion about tracking decisions made in closed session, since those actions may not appear publicly until a later meeting. Members suggested a separate closed-session action tracker, while other suggestions included identifying clearer leads and target dates for individual tasks. Staff said the tracker would likely change again as the board reorganized its working groups.
Four New Working Groups Take Shape
A major organizational change followed as the board adopted a new working group structure. The intention was to cover more of the corporation’s mandate without requiring every group to work on every priority at the same time. Members discussed the need to balance broader work such as advocacy and community outreach with the immediate task of getting affordable housing projects funded and built.
The board ultimately approved four groups: Corporate Governance and Accounting; Building Development and Finance; Advocacy, Outreach and Policy; and Community Fundraising and Communications. The existing governance, fundraising and Disraeli site working groups were dissolved as part of the change.
Members also discussed bringing community volunteers with relevant skills into the working groups, particularly as the board approaches a transition following the municipal election.
Appointments were then made to each group. Board members emphasized that the structure could also become a recruitment tool, allowing potential volunteers to see exactly where their experience in areas such as finance, development, policy or fundraising could help the corporation.
Nile Street Moves Closer to Its Next Stage
The final major public discussion concerned the Nile Street site. Staff reported that only a few remaining steps were needed before the Record of Site Condition could be filed. These included legal documentation, signatures and a letter related to servicing. Once the documents are provided to the environmental consultants, staff said the Record of Site Condition could be filed and the site would be considered shovel-ready.
The board also approved a resolution connected with transferring a portion of the Nile Street property to the County. The portion was identified during the discussion as the area closest to the green space that is not intended for development. The resolution authorized the necessary transaction and further documents required to complete it.
The public portion of the meeting ended with the board moving into closed session to discuss negotiations related to capital fundraising and development of the Queen Elizabeth Picton site and Disraeli Street Picton site.
Three Key Takeaways for PEC Residents
The housing corporation wants clearer financial reporting. Members raised several questions about money owed to the County, project costs and the corporation’s audited statements, with further answers expected from the auditor.
The board has reorganized how its work will get done. Four working groups will now cover governance and accounting, development and finance, advocacy and policy, and community fundraising and communications.
The Nile Street project is moving through important administrative steps. Staff reported that only a few remaining items were needed before the Record of Site Condition could be filed, while the board also approved documents connected with transferring part of the property to the County.
Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 3:39:24. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.
Comments