top of page

PEC Connect

Contact: hello@pecconnect.ca 
View our:  Privacy Policy   and  Terms of USE

Join Our Community

Blog, News, and More!

Prince Edward County Blog

Are you a local interested in community news, council info, and more? Or a visitor wanting to familiarize yourself with PEC? Subscribe to stay in touch with us for more of what interests you!

© 2026 by PEC Connect Inc.

Part 1: Agriculture Advisory Committee Advances Farm Safety, Mental Health, and Farmland Initiatives - 02/12/2024

The meeting was held online and was live streamed and recorded. The agenda was confirmed, but they added a new item under the planning working group update about Earth Week and a farmland-related project that came in by email. There were no conflict of interest declarations.


They held elections for committee leadership. A chair was nominated, accepted, and approved. Then a vice chair was nominated, accepted, and approved. After that, motions were passed to close nominations and to formally appoint both roles under the committee’s terms of reference. They approved the minutes from the previous meeting (October 16, 2023) with no issues. There were no deputations, no real announcements, and no audience questions.


Video conference with seven participants in individual frames. Text labels each, with muted colors and some appearing thoughtful.
© PEC Council (YouTube)

Farm safety road signage and getting signs installed


They talked about farm safety signage like slow moving vehicle warning signs tied to the earlier “Share the Road” effort. The committee explained that the signs designed locally did not meet MTO approval, and the province did not move forward even after county effort. The staff lead on the file had moved to another role, so there was no clear point person right now.


Baskets of mushrooms, red raspberries, and garlic on a market stall with pumpkins and potatoes. Colorful, fresh produce on display.

They also discussed a new push by the local farm group to get a grant to purchase more signs. If approved, the farm group would buy the signs and give them to the county, but the county would still need to install them. They talked about keeping costs low by donating posts so the county mainly pays labor. They agreed it should come back with more detail, including the five best sign locations, once the grant result is known.


Farm Tour planning and councillor attendance


They discussed the annual farm tour. Feedback from last year was very positive, but there was a feeling it should be simpler this time, maybe one main stop, possibly with food like breakfast, instead of a big multi stop tour. The biggest need was not funding or logistics help, but help getting more councillors to attend. There was a clear vibe that food helps turnout.


Noxious weeds and worker safety training expansion


They reviewed county training materials aimed at outdoor workers about wild parsnip, but the committee pushed to also include giant hogweed and poison ivy. The point was simple: these are common and can cause real harm, and staff should be trained to recognize them too. They supported bringing this request to county staff.


Guardian Network program and farm mental health supports


A big discussion focused on a mental health support training program people attended. Members said the training was useful, practical, and agriculture aware. They liked that it gave people tools to spot warning signs and have hard conversations, and that it included easy resources like magnets with contact info.


They also agreed the main issue now is awareness. They talked about ways to spread the phone number and program info through fairs, county communications, libraries, and farm supply locations. They also noted there are two programs that should be promoted together, not just one. A motion passed to recommend that council direct staff to build a communication plan for both programs.


Earth Week, farmland trust, and the cost question


A wooden gavel rests on a black wallet with U.S. dollar bills peeking out, on a wooden surface, suggesting a legal or financial theme.

They discussed an Earth Week related request connected to farmland and land trust work. The committee was open to being involved, but they had questions about how land trusts work, and especially the cost of legal work that can be very high. There was also concern about whether the public should be helping pay for legal costs tied to protecting private land, versus funding other community needs.


They decided to assign a small group to link up with the other committees and connect with farmers who may be interested.


Planning working group priorities


They reviewed what should be on the planning working group’s list going forward. They also corrected a staff name for the record. A councillor asked the working group to still help push fair based outreach for the mental health programs, and there was agreement to follow up with the training contact and check for materials at an upcoming symposium.


Rescheduling the April meeting and the eclipse confusion


They discussed possibly rescheduling the next meeting because of the solar eclipse, but people questioned the logic since the eclipse was mid afternoon and the meeting is in the evening. In the end, they basically kept the meeting on the same date and time and just adjusted the listed start time slightly, with the idea that if something unexpected happens that day, the chair can cancel.


They passed a motion to adjourn and ended the meeting.


Key Takeaways


  1. They pushed real safety work forward by focusing on farm road signage and better noxious weed training. 

  2. They treated farm mental health as a real priority and pushed for a proper communication plan so more people actually know the help exists. 

  3. They were willing to engage on farmland trust work, but they raised real concerns about cost and who should be paying.

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 51:27. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.

Comments


bottom of page