Part 2: Zoning Decisions, Farm Innovation Support, and Agricultural Priorities — 10/16/2023

This article continues the Agricultural Advisory Committee met virtually on October 16, 2023 coverage, focusing on who spoke, how motions were handled, and what the decisions mean for agricultural areas and residents in the County. Rather than listing updates one by one, this section follows how discussions unfolded and how different voices contributed to the outcomes.

Zoning bylaw discussion and member input

The zoning bylaw review remained a central topic, with Michael Michaud explaining that the rewrite is required under provincial legislation and is meant to modernize land use rules across the county. The discussion moved into how that process is being shaped by public input, with Phil Prinzen questioning why many survey questions received little or no response. Michaud noted that this likely reflects survey fatigue as well as gaps in public awareness, suggesting that engagement methods may need to evolve.

Janice Maynard raised more detailed questions around minimum lot sizes, prime agricultural land, and how agricultural areas located within or near settlement boundaries, such as north of Wellington, would be handled. Michaud explained that farming can continue in these areas for now, but over time, planned urban growth would likely replace agricultural uses. This creates a situation where farmers operating near these boundaries can continue current practices, but may face uncertainty about how their land will be used in the long term.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap>

Home and Farm Initiative presentation and vote

The committee also heard from Brian Hart, who presented the Home and Farm Initiative in more detail, outlining its proposed location, funding structure, and training approach. During questions, Janice Maynard asked how participants would move through the program and whether the goal was long term farming or short term support. Hart clarified that the initiative is designed to help participants become long term small scale farm business owners, supported by a rent to own housing model that combines stability with skill development.

Robert MacDonald raised questions about the scale of investment and how the project would operate in practice. Hart confirmed that the initiative could involve multi million dollar investment, along with partnerships with educational institutions and transportation support for participants. As the discussion wrapped up, Phil Prinzen raised the question of whether the committee should formally support the initiative.

A motion was then brought forward requesting that the Mayor provide a letter of support, which was read into the record and carried unanimously.

Guardian Network program and communications direction

Staff also introduced the upcoming Guardian Network training, noting that it will be offered locally and is free for the public to attend. The discussion quickly turned to awareness, with Phil Prinzen moving a motion to ensure stronger promotion through county communication channels, including social media and public notices. The motion was seconded and carried, reflecting agreement that programs like this are only effective if residents know about them.

Work plan updates and future focus

As the meeting moved toward its later stages, the committee reviewed several planning related items, including a severance on County Road 19, which was determined to have limited agricultural impact and did not require further comment. The committee also voted to formally add the zoning bylaw review to its work plan, reinforcing that this will remain a priority moving forward.

Members then discussed youth participation, including opportunities for community service hours and the need to better promote involvement among younger residents. A motion was passed recommending that staff increase outreach through schools and county channels, with the goal of bringing more youth into agricultural and community related initiatives.

Meeting close and next steps

The committee confirmed its next meeting for February 12, 2024, with the option to meet earlier if necessary depending on workload. The meeting adjourned at 8:11 p.m., following a motion moved by Sam Grosso and seconded by Phil Prinzen. Overall, the discussions during this meeting help guide how agricultural land use, innovation, and community engagement will continue to be addressed across Prince Edward County.

What this means for residents

While much of the discussion focused on planning and long term policy, the impacts for residents are tied to how agriculture and land use will evolve over time. The zoning bylaw review could shape what farming looks like in different parts of the county, especially in areas close to future development, where agriculture may continue for now but face gradual change.

The support for the Home and Farm Initiative points to growing interest in projects that combine housing, food production, and training, which could create new local opportunities without requiring immediate public funding. At the same time, efforts to promote programs like Guardian Network training and increase youth engagement show a push toward better awareness and participation.

Overall, the meeting reflects a steady shift toward long term planning, where decisions made now will influence how agricultural land, community programs, and local opportunities develop in the years ahead.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 1:12:05. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.