Part 2: From Weeds to Road Safety: What the Agricultural Advisory Committee Agreed On — 07/27/2026

While the Agricultural Advisory Committee did not make major policy decisions during its July 27 meeting, members clearly showed where they stand on several important issues that could shape future council discussions. Much of the meeting focused on building consensus around protecting farmland, improving road safety, and tackling invasive weeds before they become an even larger problem. Every motion brought forward during the meeting was carried without opposition, showing broad agreement among committee members on the direction they want the municipality to continue pursuing.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap>

Local Prohibited Weeds Received Strong Committee Support

The committee spent the largest portion of the meeting discussing the proposed expansion of the County's local prohibited weeds list.

Albert Paschkowiak, Environmental Services and Sustainability Supervisor, presented the report and explained why staff are recommending the addition of Canada fleabane, Palmer amaranth, and waterhemp. He explained that Palmer amaranth and waterhemp are still relatively uncommon in the County, making them good candidates for early control. Fleabane, however, has already spread across much of the County, making any decision more complicated because of its widespread presence. He also acknowledged that the existing weed mapping still needs updating and invited committee members to provide additional information before the report moves to council.

Bob Rogers, Chair of the committee, strongly supported moving ahead with action. He said herbicide-resistant weeds are already reducing crop production and increasing farming costs, adding that waiting longer could allow the problem to grow even further. Rogers thanked staff for continuing to advance the work and encouraged the County and the province to stay ahead of the issue rather than reacting after the weeds become widespread.

Committee members did not raise objections to the report. Instead, they voted unanimously to receive the discussion and continue moving the proposal forward for council's consideration.

Years of Work on Farm Vehicle Safety Nears Completion

Another update that received unanimous support involved the committee's long-running effort to improve awareness of slow-moving farm vehicles.

Ben Thornton explained that the committee previously asked the County's communications staff to develop a public education campaign to support its application to the Ministry of Transportation. According to Thornton, the ministry wanted evidence that the County was educating drivers about sharing the road safely with farm equipment.

She confirmed that the communications campaign helped complete the application process and that new warning signs at provincial highway entrances are expected to be installed during this year's harvest season.

Rogers welcomed the progress, noting that the project has taken nearly eight years to reach this point. Members also discussed making sure roadside vegetation is regularly trimmed so drivers can actually see the signs. The committee voted unanimously to receive the update and continue supporting the project.

Planning Comments on Reach Resort Were Reaffirmed

The committee also formally reviewed comments that had already been submitted by its planning working group regarding the proposed Reach Resort zoning bylaw amendment in North Marysburgh.

Thornton explained that the comments had already been provided to the planning department and that the committee was simply confirming its support. Bob Rogers said he had not seen anything in the revised application that addressed the agricultural concerns previously identified. He noted that neighbouring farming operations have long-term agricultural plans that could be affected by the proposed development.

Members voiced little disagreement. Dee Hazell agreed with Rogers' position, describing it as a firm "hard no," while Sam Branderhorst commented that the response was concise and clearly explained the committee's concerns. The committee then unanimously voted to endorse the comments already submitted to planning staff.

Members Shared Priorities for the Next Committee

Because this was the final scheduled meeting of the current council term, members also looked ahead to what they hope the next Agricultural Advisory Committee will continue working on.

Jacqui Burley said her biggest concern remains the ongoing loss of farmland through development. She encouraged future committees to continue reminding the municipality that agriculture should remain an important consideration whenever development decisions are made. Bob Rogers agreed, saying agriculture and large recreational developments can sometimes conflict and that farmers need to remain part of those conversations.

Sam Branderhorst suggested that future committee members participate in Guardians Network training to help better support farmers and agricultural families experiencing mental health challenges. Thornton confirmed that the recommendation would be documented and shared with future committees through the public record and committee feedback process.

Dee Hazell and Wyatt Brauer also emphasized the importance of preserving productive farmland. Both said protecting agricultural land should continue to be one of the committee's highest priorities, while Rogers added that future growth should be directed toward areas better suited for development rather than some of the County's best farmland.

What This Means for the Locals

Although the Agricultural Advisory Committee serves in an advisory role, the discussions from this meeting could influence future council decisions that affect both farmers and residents across the County.

If council eventually expands the local prohibited weeds list, farmers could receive additional support in managing invasive species that reduce crop yields and increase production costs. The proposed roadside safety signs could also improve awareness among residents and visitors who regularly encounter tractors and other slow-moving farm equipment during planting and harvest seasons.

The committee also made it clear that protecting agricultural land remains one of its biggest priorities. As future development proposals come before council, residents can likely expect continued discussion about balancing new growth with preserving the farmland that remains central to the County's economy and rural character.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 1:19:27. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.