Part 1: Old Boys Memorial Roof, Wellington Heritage District, Heritage Permits, and Ontario Heritage Conference - 05/07/2025
- PECConnect
- May 7, 2025
- 4 min read
Updated: Apr 30
The Built and Cultural Heritage Advisory Committee meeting of May 7, 2025 was held as a virtual, live-streamed session in accordance with the County’s procedural bylaw. The meeting opened with confirmation that the livestream was active and that the public could observe proceedings online. The Chair formally called the meeting to order, confirmed the agenda, and invited declarations of pecuniary interest. None were declared. The minutes from the previous meeting were then reviewed, with no corrections raised, and were adopted by the committee.
Following these procedural items, the committee moved into announcements and introductory remarks. Members briefly acknowledged upcoming cultural observances, including National Indigenous Peoples History Month and National Indigenous Peoples Day, noting the importance of recognition and reflection within the committee’s work.
View the entire PEC Council meeting, or continue for speaker comments and councillor votes.
Discussion on the Old Boys Memorial Entrance Roof
A significant portion of the meeting focused on the deteriorating roof of the Old Boys Memorial Entrance building at the fairgrounds. Staff presented background research outlining earlier repair efforts dating back to 2011, explaining that prior materials and installation methods had not performed as intended. The building was described as being in active decline, with water infiltration, floor rot, and mold concerns creating urgency.
The core discussion centered on whether to replace the failing cedar shakes with authentic wood materials or to use a metal shingle system designed to visually resemble cedar. The committee weighed heritage authenticity against durability, cost, and timing. It was noted that the heritage designation for the building did not explicitly require cedar shakes as a character-defining element, which provided flexibility. However, members also raised concerns about long-term precedent, technical roof assemblies, ventilation requirements, and the visual impact on adjacent heritage structures.
Budget constraints and procurement timelines emerged as critical factors. Staff emphasized that delaying action could result in further damage and higher future costs. The committee generally acknowledged that the immediate goal was to make the building watertight to preserve its structure, even if the solution was not ideal from a heritage purity standpoint. The discussion concluded with agreement that staff would proceed using the feedback provided, and the report was formally received without a binding recommendation.
Public Deputation on the Wellington Heritage Conservation District
The meeting then heard a public deputation concerning the Wellington Heritage Conservation District, specifically related to the Drake Devonshire proposal and broader policy implications. The deputation raised concerns about inconsistencies within the HCD plan, particularly regarding demolition prohibitions on contributing properties and perceived unequal treatment along Wharf Street.
The speaker argued that existing policies created unintended consequences, limiting reasonable redevelopment for some property owners while permitting significant new construction for others.
Committee members acknowledged these concerns and discussed the internal contradictions within the HCD plan. It was noted that similar heritage districts elsewhere allow for more nuanced approaches to redevelopment, and that the Wellington plan might warrant review to ensure fairness and clarity. The deputation was received, and the committee confirmed that future heritage permit applications would be subject to public process and further scrutiny.
Additional Agenda Items
Later in the meeting, the committee received updates on the upcoming Ontario Heritage Conference to be hosted locally, noting strong registration numbers and regional interest. The committee also reviewed progress on Heritage Conservation District signage, recognizing that what began as a small task had evolved into a complex, multi-stakeholder project involving funding, design, and coordination considerations.
A heritage permit application for 192 Picton Main Street was introduced but deferred to a future meeting due to outstanding questions and the need for additional information. The committee also reviewed and endorsed comments prepared by a task team regarding a site plan application for the Drake Devonshire Inn, emphasizing the importance of addressing heritage concerns before any permit application proceeds.
The meeting concluded with updates from working groups, confirmation of the next meeting date, and adjournment after a lengthy but substantive discussion.
Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 2:01:27 Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.
Comments