Part 1: Committee Explores Alternative Education, Climate Action, and Infrastructure Planning – 03/28/2024

The March 28, 2024 Committee of the Whole meeting brought councillors together at Shire Hall in Picton for a wide-ranging afternoon focused on education alternatives, climate planning, and how the County manages its core assets. The meeting was chaired by Councillor Kate MacNaughton, who opened by outlining how Committee of the Whole functions as a working session, with recommendations later moving to Council for final decisions.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council meeting, or continue to speaker comments and councillor votes>

A proposal for a nature-based K–6 school

The first major discussion came through a deputation from Claire Telford, a local business owner and parent, joined by Julie Fowler, an educator and forest school practitioner. They presented plans for a K–6 nature-based private school proposed for Edwin County Farms, designed to offer County families an alternative or supplement to traditional schooling.

Telford and Fowler described two program streams: a full-time weekday program anchored in Ontario curriculum benchmarks using a Waldorf-inspired, outdoor learning model, and a part-time community program allowing children from other schooling paths to attend one day per week. Learning would be rooted in seasonal farm and forest settings, with strong emphasis on social-emotional development, relationship-building, and what they described as “risky play” supported by professional risk assessments.

Councillors asked detailed questions about accessibility, including tuition costs, accommodation of diverse learning needs, and whether the school would be physically accessible. Fowler explained that daily costs were still being finalized, with a goal of pursuing non-profit status to support fundraising and subsidized spaces. Questions also covered how the curriculum would align with provincial standards, how students might transition to higher grades later on, and how similar schools operate elsewhere in Ontario.

After the discussion, Council formally received the deputation, signaling acknowledgment rather than approval, and Councillor Janice Maynard assumed the chair while MacNaughton moved to the presentation podium.

Environmental Advisory Committee annual update

Wearing her second hat, MacNaughton presented the Environmental Advisory Committee’s 2023 annual update, joined by Angus Ross, Vice-Chair of the Environmental Advisory Committee. The presentation focused on how the committee’s work aligns with the County’s Community Plan, emphasizing evidence-based decision-making and long-term risk awareness.

Ross outlined growing climate-related risks facing the County, including pressures on agriculture, infrastructure damage from freeze-thaw cycles, insurance challenges, and rising costs tied to extreme weather. He also described progress on the Climate Action Plan Working Group, including strong volunteer engagement and collaboration with staff on greenhouse gas inventories and policy review.

A recurring theme throughout council questions was practical action. Councillors explored topics such as solid waste diversion, the potential role of incineration, organic waste management, and opportunities to reduce landfill pressures while controlling costs. Several councillors highlighted the importance of youth engagement, with discussion about working through schools and groups like 4-H to build climate literacy and leadership.

Energy affordability also drew attention, particularly the Save on Energy cold-climate heat pump programs, which committee members described as a key way residents could reduce costs while lowering emissions. The presentation closed with discussion of Earth Day and Earth Week programming, planned as a County-wide series of events extending into early May.

Council voted to receive the Environmental Advisory Committee’s update, again acknowledging the work while allowing future recommendations to flow through formal reports.

Asset management and recreation committees

The meeting then shifted to core municipal operations. Staff presented an update on the County’s Asset Management Plan, explaining how GIS-based decision-support software is used alongside staff expertise to prioritize road and infrastructure investments. Councillors questioned how rural and urban roads are balanced, how underground infrastructure is factored in, and how often condition assessments like street scans are updated.

Later, Council reviewed changes to Ward Recreation Committee membership requirements, approving amendments to allow five to ten public members per committee. The change was framed as a way to strengthen volunteer participation and local engagement across wards.

Key Takeaways

1. Alternative education models are gaining attention, with Council showing openness to learning about new approaches without committing to approvals.

   
   

2. Climate action discussions are increasingly tied to everyday costs, from waste management to home energy use, rather than abstract policy debates.

   
   

3. How the County plans, prioritizes, and maintains infrastructure continues to evolve, with more data-driven tools paired with staff judgment shaping long-term decisions.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 1:48:57. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.