Part 1: Lawn Naturalization, Farm Finances, and Agricultural Mental Health - 04/13/2023

The County Committee of the Whole met on April 13, 2023, at Highline Hall in Wellington, bringing together council members, staff, presenters, and residents for a wide ranging afternoon discussion on environmental policy, rural finances, and community well being. The meeting was chaired by Councillor Brad Nieman with Councillor Phil St.-Jean opening the meeting and guiding the early procedural items.

From the start, it was clear this meeting would focus heavily on how county policies affect everyday life across the County, from how residents manage their yards to how farms are taxed and supported.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council meeting, or continue to speaker comments and councillor votes>

Lawn and Yard Naturalization Sets the Tone

The agenda was adjusted to hear first from Nina Marie E. Lister, Professor of Urban and Regional Planning and Director of the Ecological Design Lab at Toronto Metropolitan University, who addressed council on the County’s proposed Grass and Weeds By Law and its approach to lawn and yard naturalization. Lister framed naturalized yards as a response to biodiversity loss and climate pressures, stressing that much of southern Ontario’s land, including PEC, is privately owned and therefore critical to ecological resilience.

She explained that courts have already affirmed a property owner’s right to naturalize their yard and encouraged council to shift the language of the by law from “allowing” naturalization to actively supporting it. Lister also raised concerns about definitions within the draft, including how lawns and naturalized areas were described, and cautioned against an overly broad list of prohibited plants that could be difficult to enforce and might require deeper consultation with farmers and Indigenous communities.

Questions from councillors focused on enforcement, education, and whether financial incentives or seed programs might eventually support residents interested in naturalization. The deputation set the foundation for many of the amendments and motions that followed later in the meeting.

Council then heard from Ben Le Fort, Senior Policy Analyst with the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, who presented findings from a Cost of Community Services study completed for the County using 2020 financial data. The study compared how much different land use categories residential, farm and forest, and commercial and industrial contribute in taxes versus how much they consume in municipal services.

Le Fort described the study as a snapshot in time rather than a performance scorecard. His findings showed that all land use categories generated more revenue than the cost of services they required, with farm and forest lands demanding the least relative to revenue generated. He also used the results to highlight broader structural issues, including reliance on property taxes, the declining real value of Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund support, and limitations in provincial gas tax funding for rural municipalities without transit systems.

Councillors asked about urban versus rural tax impacts, road usage by different land uses, and how these studies could support collective advocacy to the province. The presentation emphasized how financial pressures on rural municipalities are shaped by provincial policy decisions beyond local control.

Farming and Agricultural Mental Health

A deeply personal portion of the meeting followed with a presentation on farming and agricultural mental health from Kristen Wheatcroft, Farming Mental Health Team Lead with the Canadian Mental Health Association Ontario, joined by representatives from the Ontario Federation of Agriculture. Wheatcroft shared national and provincial research showing high levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and suicide ideation among farmers, with indicators worsening after the pandemic.

She outlined several programs under Agriculture Wellness Ontario, including In the Know training, the Guardian Network, and the Farmer Wellness Initiative, all designed to provide free, accessible mental health support tailored to the agricultural community. Council agreed to waive procedural time limits so the full presentation could be delivered, and discussion focused on reducing stigma, expanding awareness, and connecting these programs with existing county safety and well being initiatives.

Public Voices on Lawn Naturalization

Later in the meeting, multiple residents and professionals spoke during Comments from the Audience, almost all returning to the topic of lawn naturalization. Speakers including Aylise Cooke, Ewa Bednarczuk, Victoria Taylor, and Lise Bois supported the draft by law’s direction while urging clearer language, stronger education, and consistency between private and public lands. Several emphasized that naturalized gardens are intentional, maintained spaces, not neglected properties, and that education would be key to community acceptance.

Key Takeaways

1. The County is moving toward a more flexible and environmentally supportive approach to yard management, with council showing strong interest in supporting lawn naturalization while balancing enforcement and invasive species concerns.

   
   

2. The financial reality of rural municipalities remains tightly constrained by provincial funding structures, and studies like the Cost of Community Services are being used to support long term advocacy rather than short term tax changes.

   
   

3. Farming mental health is being recognized as a serious community issue, with council actively encouraging awareness and uptake of free, agriculture specific mental health programs across the county.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 2:39;37. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.