Part 2: Flood Protection Secured, Event Rules Open for Input, and Land Policies Updated in PEC - 9/14/2023

This part of Committee of the Whole meeting on September 14, 2023 focused on how Council members responded to key issues, how motions were introduced and carried, and what direction was given to staff moving forward. Discussions covered environmental services, proposed bylaw changes, and updates to municipal policies, with both staff presentations and public input shaping the flow of the meeting.

Several items moved forward through formal motions, while others were directed into consultation phases for further input. The discussions also highlighted recurring themes, including balancing regulation with community impact, maintaining environmental programs, and improving clarity in municipal processes.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap>

Quinte Conservation and environmental services

Brad McNevin, Chief Administrative Officer of Quinte Conservation, presented the update and outlined why a new agreement is required under provincial legislation. He explained how the organization continues to manage a wide range of environmental services, including flood forecasting, watershed oversight, and restoration initiatives across the region. Council members asked questions that focused on watershed boundaries, ongoing tree planting partnerships, and restoration efforts connected to the Bay of Quinte, reflecting a broader interest in how these programs operate locally and how they may evolve under the updated framework.

A motion to receive the presentation and authorize the memorandum of understanding was moved by Janice Maynard and seconded by Albert Paschkowiak. With no opposition raised during discussion, the motion carried, allowing the municipality to move forward with the agreement and maintain access to non mandatory environmental services delivered through Quinte Conservation.

Special events concerns from the public

Doug McGregor, a long time community volunteer, addressed Council regarding the proposed special events bylaws and how they could affect smaller, volunteer run events. He described concerns related to increased administrative requirements, potential personal liability, and the possibility of higher insurance costs, noting that these factors could make it more difficult to organize traditional community gatherings and recurring local events.

In response, members of Council, including Phil Prinzen and Janice Maynard, clarified that the bylaws under discussion were still in draft form and were not being approved at this stage. They emphasized that the current process is focused on gathering public and stakeholder input, and that feedback from residents, event organizers, and community groups will play a role in shaping any final version of the regulations.

Sale or disposition of land and road closures

The discussion on municipal land and road policies was introduced through a motion moved by Phil Prinzen, with several members of Council contributing to the conversation, including Roy Pennell, Kate MacNaughton, Janice Maynard, and Corey Hirsch. The discussion covered a range of practical considerations, including how unopened road allowances are handled, how applications are processed, and how future uses such as trails may be considered when evaluating closures or land sales.

Council also reviewed the introduction of new application fees, including a 550 dollar fee associated with certain requests, along with timelines and requirements for public consultation. Staff confirmed that even with the updated policies in place, final decisions on closures and land transactions would continue to return to Council following consultation. After discussion, the motion carried, formalizing the updated framework.

Special events bylaw consultation direction

Council returned to the topic of special events through a motion moved by Phil Prinzen to begin formal public consultation on draft bylaws covering both public and private property. Staff explained that the intent of the bylaws is to create a more consistent permitting process, improve clarity for organizers, and strengthen enforcement while still supporting local events and businesses.

During discussion, Council members including Roy Pennell, Janice Maynard, Kate MacNaughton, John Hirsch, and Phil St-Jean raised a range of considerations, including how the rules may apply in rural areas, how repeat or seasonal events would be handled, and how issues such as noise, neighbor notification, and event frequency should be addressed. Staff confirmed that the draft approach includes options for recurring permits, maintains existing noise regulations, and will incorporate public feedback on notification requirements as part of the consultation process. The motion carried unanimously, allowing the consultation phase to proceed.

What it means for residents

The approval of the memorandum of understanding with Quinte Conservation ensures that a range of environmental services will continue without interruption, including flood monitoring, watershed management, and restoration work that supports the broader region. These services often operate in the background but play a role in long term environmental stability and risk management.

The direction to begin consultation on special events bylaws means that no immediate regulatory changes are being applied, but that a formal process is now underway that could shape how events are organized and permitted in the future. Residents, organizers, and businesses will have the opportunity to provide input before any rules are finalized.

The adoption of updated policies on land sales and road closures introduces clearer procedures and defined fees, which establishes a more structured approach to how applications are handled. While decisions will still involve public consultation and Council approval, the process moving forward will follow a more consistent and transparent framework.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 1:49:58. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.