Part 1: Grapples With Septic Rules, Social Supports, and Fire Fleet Pressures – 11/16/2023

The County Council’s Committee of the Whole met on November 16, 2023, at Shire Hall in Picton, for a wide-ranging afternoon session that brought together residents, community organizations, senior staff, and elected officials to work through several policy-heavy and financially significant issues. The meeting was chaired by Councillor Sam Grosso (Ameliasburgh) and included deputations, staff reports, and extended discussion on infrastructure, social supports, and public safety.

Throughout the meeting, members repeatedly returned to a common tension: how to balance growing community needs with fairness, clarity, and long-term sustainability.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council meeting, or continue to speaker comments and councillor votes>

Septic System Requirements and Development Clarity

The meeting opened with a deputation from Wendy Russell, a homeowner who described her experience navigating on-site sewage disposal system requirements while redeveloping a property on Bloomfield Main Street. Russell outlined months of delay, rising costs, and shifting technical expectations tied to servicing reports and septic design standards.

Her deputation led to detailed questions from councillors about hydrogeological studies, lot size thresholds, and inconsistent requirements across nearby properties. Staff explained that current rules stem from a 2019 zoning by-law amendment requiring hydrogeological reports for second dwelling units on smaller lots, and that each case is assessed individually based on wastewater flow, lot size, and environmental sensitivity.

Planning staff also noted that newer pressures, including provincial housing reforms and increased interest in intensification, are bringing these issues forward more frequently. While Russell’s request for tax relief was not resolved at the meeting, staff noted that a Municipal Property Assessment Corporation rebate process may apply in cases involving uninhabitable dwellings.

Funding Pressures on Youth and Community Support Services

Several deputations highlighted rising demand for community-based support services. Hilary Fennell, Executive Director of The ROC Youth Services, outlined growing demand for youth mental health supports, food security programs, and crisis intervention services for young people aged 12 to 18. She emphasized that demand has increased sharply since the pandemic while funding remains largely grant-based and unstable.

Councillors asked about staffing pressures, rural reach, and whether more stable municipal support could improve long-term planning.

Later, representatives from the Prince Edward Learning Centre, including Kathy Kennedy, Tammy Harvey, and volunteer Cameron Bedford, presented on the Financial Empowerment Program. They described how free tax filing and benefits navigation help residents access thousands of dollars in supports each year.

Bedford emphasized from the audience that many residents rely on these services to meet basic needs, underscoring the importance of financial literacy supports as a form of community safety net.

Fitness, Recreation, and Financial Sustainability

The Committee also heard from Sue Mathieu, representing the Prince Edward Fitness and Aquatic Centre, who provided an annual update on operations.

Mathieu reported strong recovery in memberships and programming following the pandemic but highlighted rising pressures from wages, utilities, insurance, and equipment replacement. Councillors questioned reserves, governance structure, and whether long-term ownership models should be reconsidered.

Staff clarified that Council had already approved multi-year funding in a previous budget cycle, meaning the update served primarily as an operational report rather than a funding request.

The discussion reinforced a broader theme: even successful community facilities face increasing financial pressure that ultimately feeds back into municipal budgeting decisions.

Fire Apparatus, Risk, and Service Levels

The longest and most technical discussion focused on a report from Fire Chief Chad Brown regarding the County’s fire apparatus fleet and asset management strategy.

Brown outlined regulatory standards from the Ministry of Labour, NFPA guidelines, and Fire Underwriters Survey criteria, explaining that several vehicles are beyond recommended service life. This increases maintenance costs and reduces operational flexibility.

He also introduced updated operational restrictions limiting certain high-risk interior firefighting activities to first-line apparatus, while maintaining emergency response capability across the system.

Councillors questioned insurance impacts, rural coverage, accreditation standards, and whether reduced service levels could lower costs. Staff cautioned that reductions could negatively affect insurance ratings across the County and shift financial burden onto residents.

The report ultimately set the stage for upcoming budget discussions on fleet replacement options aligned with industry standards.

Key Takeaways

1. Residents should be aware that development rules around septic systems and second dwelling units are becoming more visible and complex, particularly on smaller lots.

   
   

2. Community organizations providing youth, financial, and wellness supports are experiencing rising demand and funding instability, prompting Council to consider longer-term municipal involvement.

   
   

3. The County faces major capital decisions around fire protection, with aging equipment, regulatory standards, and rural service equity all shaping upcoming budget discussions.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 3:14:11. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.