Part 1: Growth, Infrastructure, and Pressure Points – 01/10/2024
- PECConnect
- Jan 10, 2024
- 5 min read
The County Council met on January 10, 2024, at Shire Hall in Picton, for a rescheduled regular council meeting originally planned for January 9 but postponed due to weather. The meeting opened at 7:00 p.m. and ran until nearly midnight, reflecting the volume and weight of the issues before council that night. The session was chaired by Mayor Steve Ferguson, with councillors from across the County in attendance, along with senior staff from development services, water and wastewater, planning, engineering, and community services.
Much of the meeting focused on long-planned infrastructure decisions, contested development proposals, and the growing tension between growth planning, financial risk, and public trust. The tone shifted repeatedly between technical explanation, resident concern, and broader debate about the County’s future direction.

View the entire PEC Council meeting, or continue to speaker comments and councillor votes>
Council began with a closed session to address legal matters related to the Wellington Heritage Conservation District Plan, returning to open session shortly after. That settlement was formally accepted, clearing the way for council to move into a full evening of public-facing business.
Early announcements included notices of future motions and proclamations, but the meeting’s centre of gravity quickly shifted toward deputations and public comments tied to major agenda items, particularly water and wastewater infrastructure in Wellington and the proposed TRAE Resort zoning amendment.
Public Voices Take the Floor

Deputations stretched across multiple agenda items, with residents and stakeholders addressing council on TRAE Resort, Uride transportation services, and the Wellington Watermain Trunk and Sanitary Sewer Trunk project. Due to a declared conflict of interest related to campaign contributions, Mayor Ferguson stepped aside during parts of the TRAE discussion, and Councillor Roy Pennell assumed the chair.
Speakers raised concerns about environmental impacts, land use compatibility, neighbourhood disruption, infrastructure risk, and financial exposure. Several residents questioned whether council had adequate information, whether costs were being fairly allocated, and whether long-term consequences were being fully considered. Others spoke in support of development readiness and staff recommendations, emphasizing contractual obligations and economic opportunity.
Public comment exceeded the usual 30-minute limit, prompting council to formally extend the time to allow all registered speakers to be heard. The length and intensity of public input set the tone for the debate that followed.
Wellington Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Comes to the Fore
The most detailed and sustained discussion of the night centred on the Tender Award for the Wellington Watermain Trunk and Sanitary Sewer Trunk Linear Infrastructure. This project, previously deferred for legal review, returned with a full presentation by Peter Moyer, Director of Development Services, supported by David MacPherson, Manager of Engineering, and Don Caza, Director of Water and Wastewater Services.
Staff walked council through the long planning history behind the project, including the Wellington Servicing Master Plan, development charge studies, and prior budget decisions. They explained how the trunk infrastructure connects directly to the new water tower and how delaying or cancelling the project would shift significant costs back onto existing water and wastewater ratepayers.
Questions from councillors covered system pressure, pipe age, plant capacity, impacts on infill development, environmental restoration along the Millennium Trail, and whether future infrastructure would become fully ratepayer-funded without growth to offset costs. Staff emphasized that the infrastructure had been planned as a sequence, and that proceeding without the trunk would create operational strain and financial risk.
Throughout the discussion, a recurring theme emerged: approving the tender carried financial and political risk, but not approving it also carried consequences, including contractual exposure, aging infrastructure, and higher long-term costs.
Environmental Oversight and a Second Look at the Numbers

As debate unfolded, council introduced amendments to address lingering concerns. One amendment required the Environmental Advisory Committee to review the environmental restoration plan for the Millennium Trail before approval. Another directed staff to conduct a fresh review of the Master Servicing Plan, Development Charges Background Study, and growth forecasts against current economic and environmental assumptions, with results to return before future plant tenders.
These additions reframed the decision as both a green light for immediate infrastructure work and a pause for broader reassessment. With those conditions attached, council narrowly approved the tender and associated agreements.
TRAE Resort and Transportation Return Later in the Night
Later in the meeting, council turned back to the TRAE Resort rezoning application, following extensive deputations and earlier deferral attempts. Discussion focused on agricultural land quality, tourism alignment, and changes made to the proposal since earlier meetings. The zoning amendment ultimately moved forward, with the minutes recording the formal decision.
Council also revisited Uride and community transportation solutions, agreeing to reconsider a previously defeated motion. Amendments reshaped the program to include cost-sharing with tourism partners, new service standards, an accelerated taxi by-law review, and a micro-granting program funded through Municipal Accommodation Tax revenue to support local taxi operators.
Committees, Consent, and a Late Adjournment
Before adjourning, council approved updated Terms of Reference for the Water and Wastewater Rates Community Committee, including stricter application requirements for public members. Routine consent items, by-laws, and confirmatory motions followed, closing out a long and procedural-heavy evening.
The meeting adjourned at 11:56 p.m., ending one of the more complex and consequential council sessions of the winter.
Key Takeaways
Council approved major Wellington water and wastewater infrastructure, but paired that decision with new environmental oversight and a commitment to re-evaluate long-term financial assumptions.
Public concern about growth, cost-sharing, and transparency shaped the discussion across multiple agenda items, influencing amendments and future reviews even when projects ultimately moved forward.
The meeting highlighted how interconnected decisions have become, with infrastructure, development, transportation, and environmental planning all converging around questions of affordability, trust, and the County’s long-term direction.
Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 6:02:15. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.



Comments