Part 2: Climate Planning Governance, Tree Bylaw Consultation, and Picton Terminals Environmental Concerns — 01/09/2024

The Environmental Advisory Committee focused heavily on climate planning, environmental policy development, and emerging concerns surrounding industrial activity at Picton Terminals. While several agenda items dealt with routine committee business, discussions frequently returned to a larger theme: how the committee can ensure environmental considerations are addressed early enough in municipal decision-making to make a meaningful difference.

Throughout the meeting, members balanced long-term planning discussions with more immediate concerns about environmental protection, public accountability, and the limits of municipal authority when dealing with issues that involve provincial regulators. Several speakers emphasized the importance of evidence-based decision-making, while others stressed the need to remain proactive when environmental risks are identified.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap>

Ben Thornton Guides Complex Discussions

Ben Thornton played a central role throughout the meeting, frequently helping guide discussions when conversations became complicated or emotionally charged. He worked to balance the committee’s desire for action with the need to follow proper municipal processes and gather reliable information before making recommendations.

During discussions about environmental concerns at Picton Terminals, Thornton repeatedly emphasized the importance of understanding potential risks before deciding on future actions. He also highlighted the significance of local waterways, noting that once contamination enters the bay, environmental concerns can quickly expand beyond local jurisdiction and potentially involve provincial and federal agencies.

His comments reflected a recurring theme throughout the meeting: acting carefully, but not ignoring issues that may have significant environmental consequences.

Climate Action Plan Working Group Moves Forward

One of the first major discussions involved updates to the Climate Action Plan Working Group.

Rachel introduced a motion to receive the amended terms of reference for the working group, with Kathy seconding the motion. Members discussed the importance of ensuring the group has the right expertise and structure to support future climate planning efforts. The motion passed without opposition, allowing the revised framework to move forward.

The discussion reinforced the committee’s commitment to developing climate strategies that are practical, achievable, and grounded in local realities rather than broad theoretical objectives. Members emphasized that climate adaptation and mitigation planning will continue to be a major focus area for the committee in the coming years.

Albert Paschkowiak Pushes for Earlier Environmental Input

Albert Paschkowiak, Environmental Services and Sustainability Supervisor, was one of the most active contributors during the meeting.

A significant portion of his comments focused on concerns that environmental expertise is often brought into policy development too late in the process. Specifically, he raised concerns that the Natural Cover Working Group was not consistently being consulted during the early stages of developing tree protection and site alteration bylaws.

Paschkowiak argued that scientific expertise and environmental knowledge should be incorporated before draft policies are finalized, rather than after key decisions have already been made. He stressed that early consultation improves both policy quality and public confidence in the decision-making process.

His comments resonated with several committee members, who agreed that stronger environmental input at the beginning of policy development would likely lead to better outcomes.

Committee Recommends Early Consultation on Environmental Policies

Councillor Kate MacNaughton supported Paschkowiak’s concerns and encouraged the committee to formalize its position through an official recommendation.

Following discussion, members approved a motion requesting Council direct staff to consult directly with the Natural Cover Working Group during the development of future tree protection and site alteration bylaws.

The recommendation was viewed as an important step toward ensuring environmental considerations are integrated earlier into municipal policy discussions. For residents, this could help ensure future regulations better reflect local ecological conditions, shoreline protection needs, and environmental risks.

Earth Week Planning Begins

The committee also received an update on plans for Earth Week activities and a broader climate-focused public event.

Kate MacNaughton explained that preliminary planning is already underway and that staff are working to coordinate resources and participation opportunities. While specific event details were not finalized, members expressed support for creating opportunities to engage residents in conversations about sustainability, climate action, and environmental stewardship.

The discussion highlighted the committee’s interest in public education and community engagement as key components of environmental progress.

Picton Terminals Concerns Dominate Discussion

The most extensive discussion of the meeting centered on environmental concerns surrounding Picton Terminals and the storage of industrial materials at the site.

© Picton Terminals Ltd. (Facebook)

Councillor Kate MacNaughton raised strong concerns regarding uncovered materials stored outdoors and questioned whether existing inspection processes were adequately assessing potential environmental risks. She specifically referenced concerns about airborne dust, runoff into surrounding areas, and possible contamination of local waterways.

MacNaughton challenged the notion that inspections conducted during calm weather conditions could accurately capture potential impacts, particularly when environmental conditions can change significantly over time.

The discussion reflected growing concern among committee members that the issue may require closer scrutiny and better information before conclusions can be reached.

Albert Paschkowiak Explains Regulatory Challenges

Albert Paschkowiak provided additional context regarding regulatory oversight and previous inspections at the site.

He explained that provincial inspectors had visited the property but had not taken enforcement action based on their findings. Paschkowiak noted that while some materials stored on-site may present environmental concerns, municipal authority becomes limited when responsibility for enforcement falls primarily under provincial agencies.

His comments highlighted one of the recurring frustrations discussed during the meeting: environmental concerns may be identified locally, but resolving them often depends on decisions made by other levels of government.

Catalina Blumenberg Advocates for a Fact-Based Approach

As discussions intensified, Catalina Blumenberg encouraged members to proceed carefully and avoid moving directly into advocacy without first obtaining a clear staff briefing.

She argued that before escalating concerns publicly or requesting stronger action, the committee should obtain a comprehensive update outlining what is known, what investigations have already occurred, and what regulatory responsibilities apply.

Blumenberg emphasized that well-supported recommendations are more likely to be effective and defensible than recommendations based solely on concerns or assumptions. Her comments helped shift the conversation toward a more structured approach.

Committee Requests Formal Staff Update

Following extensive debate, committee members agreed that obtaining additional information should be the immediate priority.

A motion was approved requesting that Council direct staff to provide a formal update regarding environmental concerns at Picton Terminals, specifically focusing on potentially hazardous materials stored at the site and any associated environmental risks.

The motion represented a compromise between members who wanted immediate action and those who preferred gathering more information before pursuing further steps.

Picton Terminals Added to Committee Work Plan

To further demonstrate the committee’s concern, Albert Paschkowiak suggested formally adding Picton Terminals to the committee’s ongoing work plan under full committee matters.

Members supported the proposal, ensuring the issue will remain on future agendas and continue to receive attention as new information becomes available.

This was a significant decision because it signaled that committee members view the matter as an ongoing environmental concern rather than a one-time discussion item.

Committee Moves Into Closed Session

Toward the end of the meeting, members voted to move into closed session. Required disclosures were addressed before the public livestream concluded.

As is standard practice, discussions involving certain confidential matters continued outside the public portion of the meeting.

What it means for residents

The meeting demonstrated a committee focused on strengthening environmental oversight while remaining committed to evidence-based decision-making. Members advanced climate planning initiatives, pushed for earlier environmental involvement in policy development, and raised significant concerns about potential environmental risks associated with Picton Terminals.

Several discussions underscored the importance of early environmental review, transparent public processes, and ongoing monitoring of issues that could affect local ecosystems, water quality, and community health. For residents, the meeting showed that environmental concerns are being actively tracked, debated, and documented, even when immediate solutions may not yet be available.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 43:44. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.