Part 2: Emissions Target Supported, Climate Working Group Finalized, and Tree Protection Moves Forward — 10/03/2023

This section shows the Environmental Advisory Committee that met on October 3, 2023, focusing on who spoke to key issues, how decisions were made through motions, and what those outcomes mean for residents across the County. Instead of listing items separately, it follows how discussions unfolded and where the committee landed on each topic.

Corporate emissions target discussion

The discussion around the proposed 20 percent corporate greenhouse gas emissions reduction target was led by Arryn McNichol, Director of Corporate and Legislative Services, who outlined how the target fits into the municipality’s broader climate commitments. The conversation among members focused not just on reducing emissions, but on how the County prepares for climate impacts moving forward.

Councillor MacNaughton expressed support for the collaborative approach taken across departments and highlighted the importance of pairing adaptation strategies with mitigation efforts, noting that reducing emissions alone is not enough without planning for future environmental conditions. Councillor John Hirsch built on this by asking detailed questions about how adaptation planning will be structured and whether it could open the door to federal adaptation funding. McNichol confirmed that adaptation will be included in the upcoming local action plan and could eventually evolve into a standalone strategy as the work progresses.

© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap>

The committee ultimately unanimously voted to receive the presentation, allowing staff to move forward toward a formal Council decision. For residents, this sets a clear direction for municipal climate action, which will influence how infrastructure, services, and long term planning are shaped in response to environmental changes.

Climate Action Plan Working Group decisions

A large portion of the meeting was spent refining the structure of the Climate Action Plan Working Group, with John Hirsch, Jane Lesslie, Ben Thornton, and Paulina Szlachta leading the discussion. The focus was on making the Terms of Reference clearer and more practical, ensuring that the group’s role is to collaborate with staff and support community initiatives, rather than carry full responsibility for delivering technical outcomes.

Through this discussion, the committee approved several amendments that clarified the group’s scope, strengthened references to adaptation and resilience, and simplified language to make the document more accessible to potential public participants. A motion was also passed to allow up to four public members to join the working group, with recruitment to be handled through municipal communication channels. In addition, John Hirsch and Angus Ross were appointed as initial members, helping to establish leadership as the group moves forward.

These decisions create a more defined and accessible structure for community involvement, giving residents a clearer path to participate in local climate planning and future funding opportunities.

Tree management and Natural Cover Working Group

The committee also heard from Lise Bois of the Natural Cover Working Group, who raised ongoing concerns about the effectiveness of the current tree policy, particularly its lack of enforcement and limited ability to protect mature trees in areas facing development pressure. The discussion highlighted how recent incidents of tree damage have brought renewed attention to gaps in both policy and enforcement tools.

Councillor Hirsch supported moving the issue forward to Council, noting that awareness of the existing policy is not consistent across councillors, which can make enforcement more difficult. Albert Paschkowiak provided an update from an operational perspective, confirming that some improvements have already been made following past incidents, including stronger contract enforcement and adjustments to how tree protection is handled on active sites.

The committee passed a motion supporting the Natural Cover Working Group in bringing a deputation to Council, while also recognizing that progress has already begun. For residents, this signals that tree protection, enforcement, and long term maintenance will remain active topics, especially as development continues to expand across the County.

Other decisions and wrap up

Toward the end of the meeting, the committee received discussion items related to Quinte Source Water Protection amendments, allowing technical input to move forward through staff and Council channels. Updates from various working groups were also acknowledged, with the understanding that the committee’s work plan will be adjusted once the Climate Action Plan Working Group becomes fully active.

The meeting concluded with confirmation of the next meeting date before adjournment. Overall, the decisions made during this session continue to shape how climate action, environmental protection, and community involvement are approached at the municipal level.

What this means for residents

The outcomes of this meeting point to steady progress rather than immediate change, but with clear direction on where things are heading. The emissions target discussion shows that the County is setting long term goals that will eventually influence infrastructure, services, and budgeting decisions tied to climate response.

At the same time, the creation of a more accessible Climate Action Plan Working Group opens the door for direct community involvement, giving residents a chance to be part of shaping local climate strategies. Meanwhile, the ongoing focus on tree protection highlights growing concern about how development impacts natural areas, with stronger enforcement and policy tools likely to be discussed further at the Council level.

Overall, the impact is gradual but meaningful, with decisions focused on building a more structured and participatory approach to environmental planning across the County.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 1:55:30. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.