top of page

PEC Connect

Contact: hello@pecconnect.ca 
View our:  Privacy Policy   and  Terms of USE

Join Our Community

Blog, News, and More!

Prince Edward County Blog

Are you a local interested in community news, council info, and more? Or a visitor wanting to familiarize yourself with PEC? Subscribe to stay in touch with us for more of what interests you!

© 2026 by PEC Connect Inc.

Part 2: Leadership, Tree Protection & Green Design - 05/14/2024

Kate MacNaughton chaired the meeting and guided much of the discussion around climate planning, tree protection, energy programs, and sustainable development. Throughout the meeting, she repeatedly emphasized the importance of balancing environmental ambition with realistic municipal capacity. She also stressed that residents need clear communication and transparency before major environmental policies or programs move forward.


Video call with six people in a grid layout, each in home settings with books, frames, and cabinets in the background. Some are speaking or attentive.
© PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap.


Ben Thornton played a major role in shaping discussions and motions, especially around energy financing models, sustainable design standards, and tree protection measures. He consistently pushed for practical next steps and careful research rather than rushing into commitments before the County is ready.


Together, their approach reflected a committee focused on long-term environmental planning while remaining aware of staffing limits, funding realities, and public expectations.


Energy Financing Program Discussion


A significant discussion focused on the possibility of creating a local energy financing program to help residents afford upgrades such as heat pumps, insulation improvements, and energy efficiency retrofits.


Patrick Kehoe explained how similar financing systems operate in municipalities across Ontario. He confirmed that most programs rely on property-based repayment models, where costs are repaid gradually through property taxes rather than upfront payments.


Committee members asked detailed questions about financial risk, administration, staffing requirements, and whether a smaller municipality like Prince Edward County could realistically manage such a system.


Patrick explained that while these programs can provide real benefits for homeowners, they are administratively demanding and require long-term municipal coordination.


For residents, the discussion signaled that the County is exploring ways to support energy upgrades and lower household energy costs, but no formal program has been approved or launched at this stage.


Tree Protection Policies and Enforcement


Hands cradle a small tree sprouting from soil, set against a blurred green background, symbolizing growth and care.

The committee also reviewed updates related to tree protection policies and bylaw development.


John Hirsch outlined the proposed direction of the policy, explaining that the long-term goal is to achieve net zero tree loss on public lands while strengthening protection for important natural assets.


The discussion included topics such as exemptions, fines, enforcement tools, and how future tree protection rules could operate in practice.


Albert Paschkowiak raised several pointed questions about enforcement capacity, loopholes, and how future rules might eventually apply to private property. His comments focused heavily on maintaining public trust and ensuring that any bylaw remains enforceable and understandable for residents.


The conversation reflected an effort to balance stronger environmental protection with fairness and practicality.


For residents, the discussion suggests that clearer rules around tree removal and public tree protection are likely coming in the future, along with more public communication before enforcement begins.


Green Design Guidelines and Future Development


The committee also discussed the development of potential green design guidelines for future projects and developments across the County.


Ben Thornton and Kate MacNaughton both supported continuing this work and agreed that staff and working groups should help shape the guidelines collaboratively.

Jane Lesslie volunteered to gather information from other municipalities and explore examples already being used elsewhere.


The discussion focused on encouraging future development patterns that include better landscaping, stronger tree preservation, climate-friendly layouts, and more environmentally sustainable building approaches.


Biodiversity Pledge and Staff Capacity Concerns


The committee also discussed a possible biodiversity pledge and voluntary environmental tracking commitments.


While members generally supported the goals behind the idea, Albert Paschkowiak raised concerns about staff workload and the risk of adopting commitments that the municipality may not have the capacity to properly manage.

Members agreed that environmental commitments should be realistic, measurable, and achievable rather than symbolic.


This discussion reinforced a recurring theme throughout the meeting: the importance of careful planning, staff support, and transparent expectations before taking on major new initiatives.


Overall Takeaway


The meeting showed strong alignment around several major priorities, including climate action, sustainable growth, environmental protection, and long-term planning.


At the same time, committee members repeatedly acknowledged the importance of municipal capacity, public trust, and realistic implementation timelines.

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 1:44:02. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.

Comments


bottom of page