Part 2: Council Decisions, Traffic Safety, and Environmental Oversight - 06/24/2025

Steve Ferguson chaired the meeting and set a calm but firm tone throughout. He emphasized transparency, public participation rules, and respectful conduct. His role was largely procedural, but he also reinforced that the County was taking both infrastructure and environmental concerns seriously.

Phil St-Jean declared a pecuniary interest related to closed session litigation and later played a significant role in both motions and discussion, particularly around infrastructure spending and traffic safety. His disclosure ensured compliance with the Municipal Act and maintained procedural integrity.

Photo: PEC Council (YouTube)

View the entire PEC Council Meeting; or view our recap.

Land Sale for a Community Health Hub

The most concrete decision coming out of closed session was a motion brought forward by Phil St-Jean and John Hirsch authorizing the sale of municipal industrial park land on McSteven Drive in Picton. The land will be used to establish a community health hub, and Council approved both the sale and the enabling bylaw.

For locals, this is significant. It signals tangible progress toward expanding community-based health services in Picton and reinforces Council’s willingness to use municipal land strategically for public benefit rather than purely commercial purposes.

Audit Oversight and Infrastructure Confidence

John Hirsch presented the audit committee’s annual report, outlining a year focused not just on routine financial oversight but on responding to public concern about water and wastewater costs. His presentation emphasized deeper analysis of growth assumptions, development charges, and rate studies.

Council voted unanimously to receive the report. While some audit committee recommendations were not formally adopted earlier, Hirsch made it clear that many are still moving forward administratively.

For residents, this matters because it strengthens confidence that major infrastructure costs are being scrutinized and that public concerns raised last year are influencing how studies are structured going forward.

Traffic, Speeding, and Pedestrian Safety

Kelly McGilvery, speaking as Traffic Advisory Committee chair, delivered one of the most impactful presentations of the night. She made it clear that over 90 percent of public requests relate to speeding and safety. Her committee’s push for a standardized traffic calming policy drew strong interest from Council.

Councillors including John Hirsch, Sam Grosso, Janice Maynard, Phil St-Jean, and David Harrison all engaged with questions and comments. Hirsch raised concerns about dangerous speeding near Carrying Place. Grosso asked how residents should follow up when approved measures seem delayed. Maynard highlighted the efficiency gains from verbal reporting. St-Jean discussed the reality that drivers typically exceed posted limits by about 10 kilometres per hour. Harrison raised ongoing safety concerns at the top of Picton’s Town Hill.

McGilvery responded by emphasizing road design, psychology, and low-cost interventions as more effective than enforcement alone.

For locals, the takeaway is clear. Traffic safety is being treated as a systemic issue, not just a complaint-by-complaint problem. The upcoming traffic calming policy could significantly change how speed concerns are addressed across the County.

Warrings Creek and Environmental Accountability

The most serious deputation came from Colin Leger, representing the Warrings Creek Improvement Association. He argued that a proposed development was proceeding without complying with Council’s earlier requirement for a cumulative impact hydrogeological study. He warned of irreversible damage to the watershed and future liability for the County.

Council responded decisively. Phil Prinzen introduced an amendment directing staff to report back at the July 22 meeting with an update on the study terms of reference and address the concerns raised. Council approved this direction unanimously.

For residents near Warrings Creek and across the County, this reinforces that Council expects its environmental directions to be followed and is prepared to step in when they are not.

Roads, Repairs, and Visible Results

The road repair expansion drew unusually positive feedback. Phil St-Jean questioned the wide gap between tender bids, prompting staff to explain due diligence and reference checks. John Hirsch and David Harrison both praised the quality and safety of recent road work.

Council approved expanding repairs while staying within budget.

For locals, this translates directly into smoother roads, better safety controls during construction, and a sense that infrastructure dollars are producing visible results.

What This Meeting Really Did

This meeting did not feature dramatic votes or heated conflict, but it quietly reinforced several priorities.

Council approved land for health services. Council strengthened oversight of environmental protection. Council signaled long-term change in how traffic safety is handled. Council invested more in road maintenance without raising the budget.

For residents, the impact is cumulative but meaningful. This was a meeting about follow-through, making sure previous decisions are enforced, systems are improved, and public concerns are not lost once the spotlight fades.

---

Disclaimer: This article is based on a meeting with an approximate duration of 5:21:22. Due to the length of the meeting, our team was not able to independently review the full recording in its entirety. As a result, we relied on software-generated transcription, automated summarization, and automated recognition of speakers and participants, which may not be entirely accurate. All transcriptions, summaries, and related content are prepared by our team in good faith and on a reasonable best-efforts basis. The content is provided for general informational purposes only and is intended to support public understanding of the topics discussed. While reasonable efforts have been made to present the information accurately, automated processes may result in errors, omissions, or unintended misinterpretations. This article does not constitute an official, certified, or verbatim record of the meeting, and it should not be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult original source materials, official minutes, or recordings where available for confirmation or clarification. Questions, requests for clarification, or suggested corrections may be submitted to hello@pecconnect.ca for review and consideration.